Tuesday, April 15, 2008

"Earth Hour" and the Dark Ages (by Don Boudreaux)

The World Wildlife Fund arranged today's "Earth Hour" -- a pledge by many people from around the world to turn off lights for an hour.  The following is from a page on the WWF website:

Earth Hour is a global event created to symbolize that each one of us, working together, can make a positive impact on climate change - no matter who we are or where we live.

Created by WWF in Sydney, Australia in 2007, Earth Hour has grown from a single event into a global movement. In 2008, millions of people, businesses, governments and civic organizations in nearly 200 cities around the globe will turn out for Earth Hour. More than 35 US cities will participate, including the US flagships--Atlanta, Chicago, Phoenix and San Francisco.

Earth Hour brings together communities, local governments, corporate and nongovernmental organizations to heighten awareness about climate change and to inspire our nation to take practical actions to reduce their own carbon footprints.

Reading about the WWF's "Earth Hour" -- and hearing on the radio and t.v. too many mindless endorsements of this stunt, and seeing Google's special black "Earth Hour" design for its opening page today -- I sent the following letter to Carter Roberts, President of the WWF:

Dear Mr. Roberts:

You and members of your organization worry that industrialization and economic growth are harming the earth's environment.  I worry that the intensifying hysteria about the state of the environment - and that the resulting hostility to economic growth - might harm humankind's prospects for comfortable, healthy, enjoyable, and long lives.

So I commend you on your "Earth Hour" effort.  Persuading people across the globe to turn off lights for one hour supplies the perfect symbol for modern environmentalism: a collective effort to return humankind to the dark ages.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux

By the way, of course, the WWF should award some special prize to the North Korean government, for that government keeps North Koreans not in any meager "Earth Hour," or even "Earth Day," but in what WWFers might call "Earth Decades" -- very little light ever.  This picture of the Korean peninsula speaks volumes -- the Dark Ages today; a society keeping its carbon footprint tiny.  Of course, in doing so it keeps itself also desperately poor, often even to the point of starvation.

And They Call It: Poopy Love...

So, Mr. Z has this huge crush on a girl in his class and, from the sounds of it, she kinda digs him, too. Which is great... and fucked up. The boy's nine, for fuck's sake. And since he skipped a grade, she's older -- 11 to be exact. Total Susan Sarandon/Tim Robbins thing going on.

Anywhich, each day, he comes home with more "evidence" that she's into him. Sometimes he catches her staring at him, she compliments him on his work in art class, she gave him a root beer lollipop at Family "Fun" night. Sometimes the evidence seems a little scant, but when taken all together, I think he's on to something.

Tonight, while we were chatting at bedtime, I accidentally unleashed a heinous fart. With an accent on the "einous." As he was tearing up and gasping for oxygen, we had the following exchange:

ME: Hey, do you think Miss E ever farts?

MR. Z: No way!!! She doesn't do that kinda thing!

ME: Oh, but she does. Remember that book "Everyone Poops"? Well, if everyone poops, then everyone totally farts. Especially Miss E.

MR. Z: [silently pondering this disturbing revelation]

ME: I know it can be sort of strange to think about someone you like farting and pooping. Maybe we should talk about something else...

MR. Z: I'll bet she has flowery, little pink poops.

ME: Okay, I shouldn't have said anything. It's time to go to sle--

MR. Z: And I'll bet she cuts tropical farts that smell like coconuts and bananas.

ME: All right, time to go to sleep, Tommy Bahama! You can dream about her tropical gassers all you want, but I don't want to talk about it anymore.

MR. Z: You started it!

ME: Oh yeah? Well... whoever smelt it, dealt it, okay? Goodnight.

Once again, I think I've managed to somehow invent a brand new fetish and then inadvertently foist it upon my son. Ten years from now, he's so going to be the moderator of the alt.binaries.tropicalflatus newsgroup. I better go lock up all the suntan lotion, just to be safe.

Aloha.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Larry Bartels, and how Republican Presidents drive income inequality

He writes:

In any case, the largest partisan differences in income growth, by far, occur in the second year of each administration.

The link, by the way, answers many objections to his basic thesis.  View this graph if you don't already know the argument.  The core claim is that Republican Presidents are better for the rich and Democratic Presidents are better for the poor, and to a striking degree. 

I view the statistical significance of the Bartels result as stemming from monetary policy.  Republicans are more willing to break the back of inflation and risk an immediate recession.  Alternatively, it could be said that central bankers expect enough support for tough, anti-inflation decisions only from Republican Presidents.  (Note that Jimmy Carter, who did support Volcker, is in fact the single Democratic outlier.)  Note that without the monetary policy effect, only a few data points, mostly from very recent times, support the basic claim.  Without the monetary policy effect, I do not think that statistical significance would remain.  Furthermore other plausible channels for income inequality effects, such as tax and regulatory decisions, would not be concentrated in the second year of each administration.  Monetary policy decisions would be.  A recession, by generating more unemployment, hurts the poor the most in proportional terms.

So what does this all mean?

Inflation is good for the poor in the short run, since many poor are debtors.  But inflation is bad for the poor in the long run.  Just ask anyone who lived through the New Zealand inflation of the 1970s.

So Bartels could have entitled his key graph: "Democratic Presidents live for the short run and we need a Republican President every now and then."

Addendum: Even Paul Krugman wonders about the basic mechanism driving the result.

World Wide Losses are the Best Losses

From the frozen lands of Norway's Arctic Circle to the hot sands of the Middle East and the booming metropolis of Shanghai the losses from America's subprime crisis are popping up around the world like angry whac-a-moles.  The losses are large and appear larger by being found in the most unexpected of places.  Today the focus is on these world-wide losses but I think future historians will focus on how the crisis demonstrated to everyone the power of integrated capital markets to diversify risk. 

The losses, of course, are regrettable and the desire to find and apportion blame for the crisis among investors, home buyers, mortgage brokers, credit analysts and regulators is understandable.  We should and will learn lessons.  And yet, despite problems with transparency one of those lessons ought to be that the crisis would have been worse if the losses had been more concentrated.

From this perspective, world-wide losses are perhaps the best losses of all.

Shooting On Your Estate

Comedy misunderstanding of the day had to go to the poor Tory (not financially, obviously) we were talking to at lunchtime who said they liked to relax by going shooting on their estate at the weekend.

Amongst the cross party group of staff sat there (not behind a big group of constituents, incidentally) was Dr Dave. Quick as a flash he chirped back.

"Yeah, they had a lot of shooting on my estate when I was growing up...but I think the police have got a grip of it now."

At this point I should point out that Dr Dave is from inner city Bootle in Liverpool, not from the Home County Shires. A fact that seemed to pass our companion by.

"Shoot grouse and peasants, do you?", he piped up.

"Yes, grouse, pheasants...and peasants if they get in the way. I've shot a few of them."

How reassuring. And there was me thinking the Tories had changed. :-/

I have always been amused by the very different meanings behind the word "estate" - depending your background it can be a million miles away from what you expect - but I had wondered whether Norman Tebbit had fallen into the same trap earlier this year with his views on guns?
-
(Photo Source: Wachholder0, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:BgforhuntingCrop.JPG)

noinimoD

Saved By: shpi0nka | View Details | Give Thanks

Tags: studio, blogs, rus, portfolios

PSDTuts - Photoshop Tutorials and Links - Spoonfed Photoshop Tutorials

Saved By: shpi0nka | View Details | Give Thanks

Tags: photoshop, tutorials, design

Adobe Illustrator Tutorials, Corel Draw Tutorials, and other vector graphics tutorials

Saved By: shpi0nka | View Details | Give Thanks

Tags: vector, tutorials, design

Технический дизайн, ретушь

Saved By: shpi0nka | View Details | Give Thanks

Tags: design, photoshop, tutorials, blogs, rus

DHTML JavaScript Tooltips

Walter Zorn's js tooltip. Relatively lightweight, very well annotated code.

Saved By: David Miller | View Details | Give Thanks

Tags: javascript, web design

Google App Engine - Google Code

Saved By: Harold Maduro | View Details | Give Thanks

Tags: google, web, apps, web app, infrastructure, hosting

Baghdad anniversary curfew fails to stop violence

Reuters - Found 11 hours ago
Tuesday to end a truce he imposed on his militia last year, raising the prospect of worsening violence on a day when top U.S. officials testified on ...
Bush to press case against cutting Iraq force - Reuters
Petraeus: Iraq progress is 'fragile' - CNN
Generals concerned by troops' long tours - USA Today
Explore All
AP

Iran Rejects U.S. Claim That It Funds Iraq Militias

FOXNews.com - Found 4 hours ago
TEHRAN, Iran The top American military commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, told the U.S. Congress on Tuesday that Iran funds, equips and trains ...
Iran warns West of "bloody nose" over nuclear issue - International Herald Tribune
Iran rejects US claim that it supplies weapons to Iraq militias - International Herald Tribune
Disobeying Sanctions - FOXNews.com
Explore All
AP

Food Crisis Renews Haiti's Agony

Time - Found 3 hours ago
Haitians are no strangers to hunger. But even the resilience of the hemisphere's poorest citizens can be pushed too far, and with world food prices ...
Haitian riots lead to coup talk - MSNBC
FAO sees world food shortages staying - International Herald Tribune
World food shortages to stay, riots a risk: FAO - Reuters
Explore All
AP

Sunday, April 13, 2008

The erotics of investing

When young men were shown erotic pictures, they were more likely to make a larger financial gamble than if they were shown a picture of something scary, such as a snake, or something neutral, such as a stapler, university researchers reported.

The arousing pictures lit up the same part of the brain that lights up when financial risks are taken.

...The study conforms with recent research that indicates men shown a pornographic movie were more likely to make riskier sexual decisions. Another suggests straight men think less about their financial future after being shown pictures of pretty women.

Here is more.  One question -- and perhaps a more direct test of the hypothesis -- is whether traders in more sexually integrated firms do in fact behave differently.  Or how about companies located next to modeling agencies?  I suspect in real social settings the effect washes out, for reasons identified by Freud (among others) some time ago.  The more literally minded among us might also question whether a stapler is in fact a neutral image.  It isn't for me.

Jeff Sachs on biodiversity

His new book Common Wealth devotes an entire chapter to this important topic.  Sachs writes:

The main lesson of ecology is the interconnectedness of the various parts of an ecosystem and the dangers of abrupt, nonlinear, and even catastrophic changes caused by modest forcings...It is a basic finding that biological diversity increases the productivity and resilience of ecosystems.  With more species filling more niches in a given location, a biodiverse ecosystem is better buffered against external shocks in is more adept at cycling nutrients, capturing solar radiation, utilizing water resources, and preventing the takeover of the system by single predators, weeds, or pathogens.  In other words, preserving biodiversity helps to preserve all aspects of ecosystem functions.  Removing one or more species from an ecosystem, for example, by selective harvesting of trees or fish or hunted animals, can lead to a cascade of ecological changes with large, adverse, and nonlinear effects on the functioning of the ecosystem.

Now, loyal MR readers may remember that I am genuinely uncertain how much we should worry about the loss of biodiversity.  I do know the following:

1. Many smart people who know much more science than I do are very worried about the loss of biodiversity.

2. Given that the human population has ballooned for the foreseeable future, massive losses in biodiversity are inevitable.  The question is how bad the marginal losses will be, if we do not adapt policy accordingly.

3. If I had to conduct a debate and argue that the marginal loss of biodiversity was going to be a tragedy for human beings (obviously, I can see the loss to animals, and yes I do count that for something), I would not do very well.  Yes Yana's children won't eat tuna and then I would sputter something about carbon and nitrogen cycles.

So OK readers, help me out.  I've read Sachs's passage and I don't think I disagree with any of the claims in it.  But I still cannot articulate to a skeptic exactly what marginal disaster will come if we do not take drastic action to preserve biodiversity.

Please use the comments to set me straight.  What exactly will go wrong?  And do not compare seven billion humans to pristine nature.  Compare seven billion humans with bad biodiversity policy to, say, five billion humans with a pretty good biodiversity policy.  What exactly is the difference?  What are these costs as a percentage of gdp? 

Please be as specific as possible; I genuinely would like to learn more.

Car patrol vs. foot patrol

Car patrol eliminated the neighborhood police officer.  Police were pulled off neighborhood beats to fill cars.  But motorized patrol -- the cornerstone of urban policing -- has no effect on crime rates, victimization, or public satisfaction.  Lawrence Sherman was an early critic of telephone dispatch and motorized patrol, noted, "The rise of telephone dispatch transformed both the method and purpose of patrol.  Instead of watching to prevent crime, motorized police patrol became a process of merely waiting to respond to crime."

That is from Peter Moskos's Cop in the Hood: My Year Policing Baltimore's Eastern District; here is my previous post on the book.

Why economics was late in starting

I've already posed the question, I'd like to add two points.  First, sustained economic growth in the Western world starts in 17th century England, as shown by Greg Clark.  Interest in economic reasoning then comes rapidly, first from the mercantilists, then in Adam Smith and some earlier free trade thinkers, such as Dudley North and Nicholas Barbon.

Second, the idea of "private vices, publick virtues" was central for eighteenth century economic thought and for social science more generally.  This came from Bernard Mandeville (drawing upon the French Jansenists) in 1720.  It's no accident that Mandeville lived in the Dutch Republic, which had very little censorship.  No, I am not a Straussian but the merits of that viewpoint are often overlooked.

The School of Salamanca had an excellent marginal utility theory in 17th century Spain, the framework simply did not go anywhere.  For that matter we can look later and see that Samuel Bailey, Mountifort Longfield (1834), and others had critical components of Marshall.  But no one really cared because they could not yet see how important those contributions would turn out to be.  This is a central theme in why the growth of economic thought took so long.

It also suggests that today we might have some very important ideas amongst us, we simply cannot yet see how fruitful they will be.  Their own proponents may not even know it.

Vote Match - They Are Thinking What You Are Thinking

Ever wondered which of the London Mayoral candidates you have most in common with?

Now, if you need someone to tell you how you might vote, you can take the test here.

Apparently if I did have a vote (which I don't), then I would vote for Ken Livingstone (which I can't), but if I did (which I won't), that is something I knew already.

As I say, brilliant invention.
-
(Photo Source: Ruddyell and G-Man, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Kenlivingstone.JPG)

Online Recruitment Dips in March, According to the Monster Employment Index UK

— Online Hiring Falls Slightly Following Record Growth in February — — HR Sector Hit Hardest — Online recruitment activity in the UK eased slightly in March as the Monster Employment Index dropped by 5 points, following record growth in February. The Monster Employment Index UK is a monthly analysis of millions of online job opportunities culled from a large, representative selection of corporate career sites and job boards across Europe, including Monster.co.uk. The Index fell to a level of 187 points in March, partly due to a significant drop in online job availability in the HR sector. The Index also showed a notable decrease in demand for craft and related workers. Overall, the Index is up 37 points, or 25 percent, compared to March 2007. "Despite the slight dip in March, the first quarter of 2008 brought strong growth in online job demand," said Hugo Sellert, Head of Economic Research, Monster Worldwide. "The labour market remains tight as employers continue to try and fill vacancies. The financial sector shows fewer opportunities than last year amid continued turmoil in the banking sector, but prospects for growth across most other UK industries still appear favourable." Monster Employment Index UK results over the past 13 months are as follows: Mar08 Feb08 Jan08 Dec07 Nov07 Oct07 Sept07 187 192 160 174 169 160 162 Aug07 Jul07 Jun07 May07 Apr07 Mar07 167 165 170 162 141 150 Notable Decline in HR Hiring in March There was a significant decrease in online job demand in the HR sector, led by a decline in opportunities for professionals. Growth dipped across most regions in the UK, with London registering the sharpest fall following two months of continued growth. The South East and South West fell after one and two months of growth respectively, while hiring in Northern Ireland remained stable. Year-on-year increase was 4 points, or 2% Opportunities in the healthcare, social work sector decreased notably in March, following strong growth in February. This dip reflects reduced hiring for both technicians and associate professionals; and professionals. By contrast, demand grew for service workers and shop and market sales workers within this sector for the second month in a row. Regionally, the South West registered the biggest decline, while there was an upturn of opportunities in Northern Ireland. Job availability in the education, training and library sector also dipped, reversing the upward trend in February. A slowing of vacancies was seen among professionals, which saw strong growth in February. Regionally, East Anglia, London and the South East saw the sharpest declines; while the Midlands and Wales each saw increases for the second consecutive month. Contrastingly, the legal sector saw a considerable rise in online job demand, increasing by 38 Index points after two months of decline. Professionals experienced the highest demand in the sector. The South East showed the highest rate of increase, following two months of decline. London also registered a significant increase in opportunities. Decreases in Online Demand for Craft and Related Workers; and Clerks in March Online job availability for craft and related workers fell by 15 Index points in March, reversing two consecutive months of growth. Sharp declines were seen in the construction and extraction; and production, manufacturing, maintenance, repair sectors. Online hiring dipped in most of the regions, with the Midlands showing the sharpest decline. There was a slight increase in Northern Ireland for the second month in a row. Hiring of clerks also went down in March, following an increase in February. The sharpest dip was in the administrative, organisation; and the sales sectors. An upturn was registered in the public sector, defence, community; and transport, post and logistics sectors for the second consecutive month. Online recruitment fell across the UK, with Scotland showing the deepest decline. Job availability also dipped considerably in North England and the South West. In contrast, there was a rise in demand for legislators, senior officials and managers in March, for the second month in a row. Regionally, Scotland and Northern Ireland showed the highest demand. Year-on-year growth was 47 points, or 39 percent. Online Recruitment Dips in the Majority of UK Regions There was a downturn in online hiring across most regions in the UK in March. The most significant fall was in the Midlands, led by a sharp decline in the management and consulting sector. Job availability in the region also dipped in IT, after five months of continued increase. By contrast, the legal sector saw a recovery after two months of decline. North England decreased as well, despite a high rate of increase in the environment, architecture and urbanism sector for the second consecutive month. Among occupational groups, job availability went down for plant and machine operators and assemblers; and clerks. There was also a sizeable dip in East Anglia in March, led by falls in demand in the administrative, organisation; healthcare, social work; and IT sectors. Online hiring increased markedly in Scotland for the second successive month. The highest growth in hiring was in the engineering sector, as it was in February. Meanwhile, demand in the construction and extraction industry grew for the fourth straight month. Year-on-year growth was 56 points, or 40 percent. Monster Employment Index UK data for April will be released on May 13, 2008. About The Monster Employment Index UK Providing a broad, comprehensive monthly analysis of online job demand, the Monster Employment Index UK is an extension of the Monster Employment Index Europe, which is compiled each month by researchers at Monster Worldwide Europe. Launched in June 2005, the Monster Employment Index Europe provides monthly insight into recruitment trends across the European Union. The Index report is based on a real-time review of millions of employer job opportunities culled from a large, representative selection of corporate career sites and job boards across Europe, including Monster®. The Index is audited by Research America, Inc. and provides analyses of online job demand within occupational categories, industry sectors and regions. Monthly Index reports for Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom and Europe are available at: http://corporate.monster.com/Press_Room/MEI_EU.asp.

Rapid Learning – Using the EHR to Make a Real Difference!

A really good piece of news and a demonstration of where the EHR can get us! Kaiser culls own data for insight By Helen Altonn haltonn@starbulletin.com Kaiser Permanente Hawaii is taking an unusual approach to improve care, reduce early deaths and lower costs for patients with cardiovascular disease. Instead of recruiting volunteers for an expensive study, it is using its electronic medical record system, KP HealthConnect, to examine heart disease prevention and management in about 150,000 adult isle patients. "What we're interested in learning is how electronic medical records improve care," Dr. Thomas M. Vogt, senior investigator at Kaiser Permanente's Center for Health Research in Honolulu and principal investigator for the two-year study, said in an interview. The center received $600,000 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study prevention and management of heart disease and stroke and find ways to improve cardiovascular care nationwide. Kaiser...

This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.

Venezuelan TV drops Bart for 'Baywatch'

USA Today - Found 9 hours ago
CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) - D'oh! A Venezuelan TV channel has yanked The Simpsons off the air because it may be inappropriate for children. Taking its ...
Venezuela to Simpsons: Get Out, Gringos! - TMZ
Venezuela Beaches Homer for the Hoff - E! Online
Venezuela axes "The Simpsons" as bad for kids - Reuters South Africa
Explore All
Reuters UK

Flickr purists gripe about video expansion

CNET News.com - Found 4 hours ago
Shortly after , a number of users are up in arms. The No Video on Flickr amassed more than 4,000 members just a few hours after the new feature ...
Flickr Adds Video Capabilities to Service - Slashdot
At last, Flickr adds support for video - ZDNet
Yahoo extends Flickr with video - CNET News.com
Explore All
Tech.co.uk

Details trickle out on Nokia's answer to iPhone

CNET News.com - Found 5 hours ago
This is Nokia's answer to the iPhone, and it's expected later this year.(Credit: Symbian-Freak.com) More details about Nokia's upcoming Tube phone ...
Nokia to Pay $314 Million to Close German Plant - New York Times
Nokia shows off 'Tube' iPhone-lookalike - CNET News.com
Nokia and Universities to Research Pervasive Communications - New York Times
Explore All
Tech.co.uk

Web Geekery in Recent Literature: 4/3/08

J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr;5(4):593-7.
Quality of CT colonography-related web sites for consumers.
Sheran J, Dachman AH.

Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

PURPOSE: Patients often request to undergo computed tomographic colonography (CTC) from radiologists or referring physicians on the basis of their personal examination of information on the Web. Therefore, the authors examined the information on CTC and virtual colonoscopy available for consumers on the Web to assess its quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The term virtual colonoscopy was entered into 3 popular search engines: Google, Yahoo, and MSN. In each case, evaluation was limited to the first 50 Web sites, or hits, which were recorded and analyzed for content, comprehensiveness, and accuracy. RESULTS: Sixty-seven Web sites were deemed appropriate for further analysis. More than half of the sites reported currency dates more than 2 years old. Only a third of the sites included information about the risk factors for colorectal cancer. About a third of the sites did not explain the indications for the use of CTC, and the remaining sites lacked consistent descriptions of the indications. Few Web sites offered or described the option of performing same-day optical colonoscopy for patients with abnormal results on CTC. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that patients are often armed with very incomplete information from Web sites on CTC. Web sites were often found to be outdated, to contain conflicting information, and were lacking descriptions of patient risk factors for colorectal cancer. Several suggestions are made to improve the dissemination of comprehensive, current, and accurate information.

PMID: 18359448

_____________________________

Hum Reprod. 2008 Mar 27 [Epub ahead of print]
Infertility information on the World Wide Web: a cross-sectional survey of quality of infertility information on the internet in the UK.
Marriott JV, Stec P, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Braude P, Coomarasamy A.

Assisted Conception Unit, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Guy House, Guys Hospital, 4th Floor, London SE1 9RT, UK.

BACKGROUND The internet is a frequently used source of information for infertile couples. Previous studies suggested that the quality of health information on the internet is poor. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of websites providing information on infertility and its management in the UK. Differences between website types and affiliations were assessed. METHODS A Google search for the keyword ‘infertility’ was performed and 107 relevant websites were identified and categorized by type. Websites were assessed for credibility, accuracy and ease of navigation using predefined criteria. RESULTS The total scores for all types of websites were low, particularly in the accuracy category. Websites affiliated to the UK National Health Service (NHS) scored higher than those affiliated to private fertility clinics and other clinics providing non-conventional fertility treatment. Specifically, NHS websites were more likely to report success rates (92.9% versus 60% and 0%, P PMID: 18372253

_____________________________

Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Feb 15;72(1):10.
Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education. [Free full text]
Cain J.

University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, USA.

Online social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace are extremely popular as indicated by the numbers of members and visits to the sites. They allow students to connect with users with similar interests, build and maintain relationships with friends, and feel more connected with their campus. The foremost criticisms of online social networking are that students may open themselves to public scrutiny of their online personas and risk physical safety by revealing excessive personal information. This review outlines issues of online social networking in higher education by drawing upon articles in both the lay press and academic publications. New points for pharmacy educators to consider include the possible emergence of an “e-professionalism” concept; legal and ethical implications of using online postings in admission, discipline, and student safety decisions; how online personas may blend into professional life; and the responsibility for educating students about the risks of online social networking.

PMID: 18322572

_____________________________

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):441-4.
SCAI launches seconds-count.org: An interventional cardiology resource for patients and physicians.
Weiner BH, Marshall JJ.

St Vincent Hospital at Worcester Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01608, USA. president@scai.org

PMID: 18288740

[Okay, not a lot in the abstract, but check out the site.]

JANE, eTBLAST, and Whatizit

When I posted in February about JANE, I should also have mentioned eTBLAST(previously mentioned here):

Our service is very different from PubMed. While PubMed searches for “keywords”, our search engine lets you input an entire paragraph and returns MEDLINE abstracts that are similar to it. This is something like PubMed’s “Related Articles” feature, only better because it runs on your unique set of interests. For example, input the abstract of an unpublished paper or a grant proposal into our engine, and with the touch of a button you’ll be able to find every abstract in MEDLINE dealing with your topic. No more guessing whether your set of keywords has found all the right papers. No more sorting through hundreds of papers you don’t care about to find the handful you were looking for–our search engine does it for you.

I also recently stumbled across Whatizit:

Whatizit is a text processing system that allows you to do textmining tasks on text. The tasks come defined by the pipelines in the drop down list of the above window and the text can be pasted in the text area. The description of each individual task/pipeline can be found following the link next to the submit button. Whatizit is also a Medline abstracts retrieval/search engine. Instead of providing the text by Copy&Paste, you can launch a Medline search. The abstracts that match your search critetia are retrieved and processed by a pipeline of your choice.

Fetal Cells Transplanted into the Brain to Treat Parkinson’s Disease May Not Function Long Term

 Fetal Cells Transplanted into the Brain to Treat Parkinson’s Disease May Not Function Long TermRush University Medical Center -Newswise Science News, (06 Apr 2008)"Neurons grafted into the brain of a patient with Parkinson’s disease fourteen years ago have developed Lewy body pathology, the defining pathology for the disease, according to research by Jeffrey H. Kordower, PhD, and associates and published in the April 6 issue of Nature Medicine. "..."“These findings give us a bit of pause for the value of cell replacement strategy for Parkinson’s disease,” said Kordower. “We still need to vigorously investigate this approach among the full armament of surgically-delivered Parkinson’s disease therapies. While it is not clear to us whether the same fate would befall stem cell grafts, the next generation of cell replacement procedures, this study does suggest that grafted cells can be affected by the disease process.”"..."The collaborative research study described in the article involves Rush, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, and the University of South Florida, Tampa, In it, individuals with Parkinson’s disease received fetal cell transplants to reverse the loss in the brain of striatal dopamine"...Posted by msredsonyas to Cognitive Sciences-Neuro-Philosophy-Psychiatry-Psychology NeuroChemical or Synaptic Signaling Stem Cell Lines-ES-HES Efficacy and or safety studies Medical Sciences on Mon Apr 07 2008 at 04:22 UTC | info | related

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Have We Seen That Apprentice Somewhere Before?

I am a big fan of The Apprentice, it is a great programme that allows us to laugh and despair at those people who consider themselves high flyers in the world of business - but who, for the most part, actually need a bit of help tying their own shoelaces.

It's often a triumph of self belief and business jargon over any sort of ability or sense of business judgement, and it seems that this series is no different.

And thank goodness for that.

If you missed it then you can visit the website here and watch the highlights - the boardroom argument between Raef, Alex and Nicholas is in particular a wonder to behold.

One episode in and already we are talking about "class". Every series we have a situation where those who went to private school and have a priviliged upbringing snootily look down on those hardworking commoners who they do not see as being born to lead like them. It is quite an achievement that one week into this series a massive split has already been engineered and a row has ensued.

Nicholas de Lacy-Brown sneered at the hardworking Alex for being a "salesman", as if that was some sort of insult when their task most weeks is to be able to sell a product. "You are a salesman", said de Lacy-Brown, before Alex ticked him off saying he was a "Area Manager".

"OK, you're a manager of salespeople", de Lacy-Brown smirked, feeling he had really rammed home his point - forgetting perhaps for a moment that Sir Alan Sugar had worked his way up to multi-million pound entrepreneur from being a working class salesman.

Nicholas blamed the split on the group between the "educated" and "uneducated" people. Or rather those who were brought up to talk properly, and those who weren't. It was rather amusing that the person he directed his attack at for being uneducated was someone called Alexander Wotherspoon, a university graduate with a broad Yorkshire accent, who defended himself to the hilt saying "I went to private school, what do you mean uneducated".

And that is the joy of The Apprentice, even the "heroes" are idiot villains. And the "villains" are super-idiot villains.

Take Raef Bjayou, the man of the incredible fop quiff and self styled "entrepreneur", who said of the class debate (after whipping up the debate in the first place):

"I'm just finding this conversation just incredibly boring... I get on with Prince or pauper."

No prizes for guessing who he thought was the prince and who was the pauper in the class debate, and whilst Nicholas may like to talk about class, I have to wonder how much true class he possesses after attacking last year's super-idiot villain-in-chief Katie Hopkins, by saying:

"Err, has she looked in the mirror? I think she should look in the mirror, although if she does, she should be aware that it might crack, which might give her seven years' worse luck than she has had already."

Admittedly, she had said of him that he had the "most punchable face in the UK", but by this point I was already rather struck by how much Nicholas resembled Tory leader David Cameron.

The vacant, privately educated poseur who had absolutely nothing worthwhile to say whatsoever. Can you still not see the resemblance?

Although, of course, David Cameron would never have been voted off the show first - I am sure he at the very least knows the price of a lobster.
-
(Photo Source: Dantadd, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Davidcameron.jpg)

Unintended Lesson (by Russell Roberts)

Last night, Hillary Clinton was on the Tonight Show and she gave a phenomenal example of the power of economics. Unfortunately, she did not appear to understand the example. At the 3:23 mark of this video, she tells a story (HT: Jim Colburn):

I was in Indianapolis the other day and I was shaking hands after I spoke. And there was this young boy about eleven years old and he's trying to tell me something—you know the crowd was yelling—so I leaned over and he said, "You know, my mom makes minimum wage and even though it went up, her hours were cut. So we're not making any more money. Can you help her?" You know,  when somebody says something like that to you, it really does kind of energize me.  I think, yeah, I can, I'm going to really try to help you, because this is wrong. And everywhere I go I hear stories like that about veterans who don't get health care, about people, who are, you know,  losing their jobs, and I think we can do so much better. So for me it's just get up every day and  fight on because this country's worth fighting for.

She then launched into a litany of economic disaster ("we're borrowing money from the Chinese to pay for oil from the Saudis") and finished up talking about the "deteriorating middle class."

I don't believe the story. What eleven year-old boy whispers into the ear of a big shot the details of his mother's wage/hours mix? And I like how she had to lean over--no one--not even Bill Richardson or Sinbad--can contradict her.

But let's give Hillary the benefit of the doubt. Suppose the story really did happen. She clearly thinks the story is emblematic of something important that needs to get fixed. What is it? Just when you help someone by passing a minimum wage, greedy employers ruin everything by lowering the hours. Well, we need to "fight" and fix that, too.

I wish Jay Leno had pointed out that the cut in hours was the result of passing the minimum wage--that it was as inevitable as gravity. I wish he'd said that the story showed how the minimum wage is a false promise of prosperity. I wish he'd pointed out that fighting isn't enough, caring isn't enough, that prosperity can't be legislated any more than self-interest can be made illegal. I wish Jay Leno had said that when you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is to stop digging.

And if that little boy really exists, I'd like to tell him that a Senator fighting for you is a losing proposition. You have to fight for yourself. If your Mom wants more money, she needs to go back to school or work a second job. And as for you, stay in school. It's the best way to avoid earning the minimum wage.

Baby Sleep, Childhood Obesity Tied

Time - Found 8 hours ago
(CHICAGO) - A new Harvard study finds that babies and toddlers who sleep fewer than 12 hours daily are at greater risk for being overweight in ...
Babies' lack of sleep boosts later... - CNN
How Not to Get Baby to Sleep - Time
Study: Sleepless Babies At Greater Risk for Obesity - FOXNews.com
Explore All
KOAA.com

World’s largest swimming pool

 World’s largest swimming poolCool! Posted by BraunistLand to uploaded on Mon Apr 07 2008 at 04:25 UTC | info | related

Useful and Interesting Health IT Links from the Last Week – 23/03/2008

Again, in the last week, I have come across a few reports and news items which are worth passing on. These include first: AHRQ Awards $5 Million To Help Integrate Clinical Decision Support Technologies into Health Care Delivery Press Release Date: March 13, 2008 The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS') Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has awarded $5 million for two new health information technology contracts that will focus on the development, adoption, implementation and evaluation of best practices using clinical decision support. Clinical decision support helps health professionals make informed patient care decisions. The Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston and Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, CT, have been selected to incorporate clinical decision support into widely used health IT products, demonstrate cross-platform utility, and establish lessons learned for clinical decision support implementation across the health IT...

This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.

The 7 Best Foods We Never Eat - Pantry staples - Revolution Health

 The 7 Best Foods We Never Eat - Pantry staples - Revolution Healthwww.revolutionhealth.comCool health site... Posted by BraunistLand and 1 other to uploaded on Mon Apr 07 2008 at 04:25 UTC | info | related

New York Social Diary - Raoul Wallenberg Award

 New York Social Diary - Raoul Wallenberg Awardwww.newyorksocialdiary.comI wish I could go... Posted by BraunistLand and 1 other to uploaded on Mon Apr 07 2008 at 04:25 UTC | info | related

PerspTut

 PerspTutwww.treeshark.comCool perspective lesson... Posted by BraunistLand and 1 other to uploaded on Mon Apr 07 2008 at 04:25 UTC | info | related

Los Angeles Discoveries

 Los Angeles Discoverieswww.newsletternet.comInteresting article... Posted by BraunistLand to uploaded on Mon Apr 07 2008 at 04:25 UTC | info | related

Doubt is Their Product - Early Reviews are In


My book Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health (Oxford University Press, 2008) will be officially released May 1st (though it's available now through Amazon and Powell's), and I’ll be writing and speaking more about it over the next several weeks. The book reports on the way scientists working for “product defense” consulting firms manufacture uncertainty in order to help polluters and producers of dangerous products avoid or delay public health and environmental regulation.

I'm fortunate that Doubt is Their Product has already been reviewed by two journalists who do an excellent job describing the problems that decades of manufactured uncertainty have created for today's health and environmental advocates. The reviews by Chris Mooney at The American Prospect and Arthur Allen at The Washington Independent are both worth reading, whether or not you're seeking book-purchasing guidance.

In Doubt, I recount how the strategy of manufacturing uncertainty was pioneered by the tobacco industry. Clearly successful, it has been adopted by the asbestos, beryllium, chromium, and pesticide industries, among others, and it is the strategy used by global warming deniers. There are few industries that haven’t tried it - Andrew Dressler at Grist has a new piece on how the Indoor Tanning Association is trying to convince the public that “there is actually no evidence linking sun exposure with cancer.” (I talk about that in my book, too.)

Challenging the science behind any proposed environmental regulations has become standard operating procedure. Doubt is Their Product describes how polluters have not only delayed action on specific hazards, but, with the help of the Bush Administration, they have constructed barriers to make it harder for lawmakers, government agencies, and courts to respond to future threats.

In his review, Chris Mooney explains how product defense firms' exploitation of science leads to larger problems:

All of science is subject to such exploitation because all of science is fundamentally characterized by uncertainty. No study is perfect; each one is subject to criticism both illegitimate and legitimate — and so if you wish, you can make any scientific stance, even the most strongly established, appear weak and dubious. All you have to do is selectively highlight uncertainty, selectively attack the existing studies one by one, and ignore the weight of the evidence. Although Michaels focuses largely on the attempts to whitewash the risks that various chemicals pose to the workplace and public health, the same methods are also used to attack the scientific understanding of evolution and global warming.

And it happens virtually every time the government even dreams of regulating a substance. People know what’s going on, but they respond as if they’re simply shocked, shocked, to find science being tortured. And so the outgunned federal agencies that must consult science to take action — the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, and Food and Drug Administration, among others — repeatedly capitulate to corporations that effectively purchase science on demand.

We used to have a regulatory system — that was the dream, anyway, of the 1960s and 1970s. But in significant part due to the manufacturing-uncertainty strategy, we now have the bureaucratic equivalent of clotted arteries. And mercenary science hasn’t just blinded federal agencies. It has also blinded the courts, where the same tactics apply. Indeed, recent changes to the role of science in the federal regulatory system and the courts have worsened the situation by making corporate sabotage of scientific research easier than ever.

The 1998 Data Access Act (or “Shelby Amendment”) and the 2001 Data Quality Act, both originally a glint in Big Tobacco’s eye, enable companies to get the data behind publicly funded studies and help them challenge research that might serve as the basis for regulatory action. Meanwhile, the 1993 Supreme Court decision in the little-known Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals case further facilitates the strategy, unwisely empowering trial court judges to determine what is and what isn’t good science in civil cases. Under Daubert, judges have repeatedly spiked legitimate expert witnesses who were otherwise set to testify about the dangers demonstrated by epidemiological research. Often juries don’t even hear the science any more because the defense can get it thrown out pre-trial.

Arthur Allen, meanwhile, focuses on beryllium, a lightweight metal used in manufacturing nuclear weapons and other products. The Atomic Energy Commission started limiting workers' beryllium exposure in 1949, after many had already developed crippling lung disease; when it turned out that limit wasn't protective enough, both OSHA and the Department of Energy began the process of lowering the beryllium exposure limit. Brush Wellman, the largest U.S. manufacturer of beryllium, responded by hiring scientists to critique government studies and raising doubts about proposed new limits – and so far, OSHA still hasn't updated its inadequate beryllium exposure limit. Allen emphasizes the human toll that beryllium exposure can take:

From 1958 to 1993, Gary Renwand Sr. worked as a machinist at the Brush Wellman plant southeast of Toledo, Ohio, shaping parts for space capsule reentry shields, electrical switches and brake pads. "There was a lot of powder in the air," he told me. "We were never even told to wear masks until the last few years."

Toward the end of his work years, Renwand's mornings began with a coughing fit. Ultimately, he was diagnosed with chronic beryllium disease. He now heads a support group in Ohio for 200 other sick beryllium workers. Fifteen have died in the last few years.

In beryllium disease, which strikes as many as 15 percent of people exposed to the metal, the immune system goes into overdrive to try to rid the lungs of the invader. Renwand has been on a daily regimen of steroids for 15 years to counter his immune response. The steroids cause him to put on weight, and he now suffers from diabetes, heart disease and osteoporosis, in addition to breathing difficulties.

Renwand's oldest son, 51-year-old Gary Jr., has beryllium disease, too. And the elder Renwand worries about his youngest son, who is still working in the plant. "If I had known what I know now, I never would have let them go to work there. But there aren't a lot of decent-paying jobs around here."

It doesn’t have to be this way. There are ways to address these problems within our regulatory system and the court. I’ll be writing more about them in the weeks to come — and, of course, you can always learn about them from Doubt is Their Product itself.

Capital requirements smackdown watch

Eric Falkenstein writes:

How much capital for derivatives? Good question. Should it be weighted by risk? If so, how does one measure risk? Considering that risk is a function of the collateral, which comes in many different flavors (traded debt, pools of mortgages, pools of bank lines), and then are structured very differently, with differing levels of subordination, differing rules for the waterfalls of cashflows depending on various metrics of collateral quality. It's a mess.

...You may think this is no different than regular lending, but you would be wrong. For example, lets say you have two swaps, but they both offset each other almost exactly for interest rate risk, but as they have different counterparties, they have differing credit risk. How about swaps from the same counterparty, but differing interest rate exposures, partially netted. How much should capital be netted? And if the US banks have capital requirements greater than economically necessary, how many seconds before all swaps would move offshore?

I take him to be saying that financial institutions can never be transparent in their risk-taking, or at least not in the sense that can be made accountable to a regulator.  Read the whole thing.  Read also Doug Colkitt's comment here.  Note by the way that Bear Stearns, at the time of its collapse, had met Basel capital requirements.

Mark Thoma writes:

I'd argue that even though Basel was not perfect it was much better than having no regulation at all...If the regulations under Basel caused banks to move assets off the books, then without regulation they wouldn't have needed to move them, but the assets still could have been used in the same way, financial institutions could have taken the same risks and would have had the same or more incentive to do so without regulatory oversight, and they could have caused the same troubles. I don't see how the regulations themselves caused the risk taking. Regulation caused evasion of regulation, and Basel II is trying to deal with that problem, but the regulations did not cause the risk-taking itself.

Currently my view is closer to Thoma's.  The case against regulation requires that derivatives risk is observable (by the bank itself, and of course if it is not observable to anyone run the other way!) but not verifiable to an outside regulator (otherwise it could be controlled by regulation).  Even in that case, however, more informal systems of regulation should work, albeit imperfectly.  Yes banks will sometimes lie and trick the regulators but at least another layer of protection is in place.

There's lot of talk about the government buying up mortagages.  Even if you favor that plan, it's a one-off measure, not a long-term solution to stop a future crisis.  There is in fact a paucity of good regulatory proposals on the table.  There are plenty of ideas for how to stop what went wrong "last time" but fewer good ideas for how to stop the next version of a financial crisis.

Making Americans Poorer (by Don Boudreaux)

"Clinton Proposes Plan to Make Firms Inefficient" would have been a more accurate headline to this report at Newsweek.com.  I sent this letter in response:

Courting blue-collar votes, Hillary Clinton promises to use "tax incentives to persuade companies to 'insource' jobs in the United States" ("Clinton proposes plan to keep jobs in US," April 2).  Because firms 'outsource' jobs only when doing so lowers firms' costs of production, Mrs. Clinton's proposal amounts to bribing American firms not to lower production costs whenever possible.  She wants to encourage American firms to produce inefficiently, which is to say wastefully.  In short, she wants us to be poorer than we would otherwise be.

Mrs. Clinton's proposal is further evidence that good politics typically is bad economics.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux

More on Bartels

I'm a little surprised that the Bartels result is receiving so much attention because the result, in slightly different form, has long been known to political economists under the rubric of partisan business cycle theory.  In a nutshell, the theory of partisan business cycles says that Democrats care more about reducing unemployment, Republicans care more about reducing inflation.  Wage growth is set according to expected inflation in advance of an election.  Since which party will win the election is unknown wages growth is set according to a mean of the Democrat (high) and Republican (low) expected inflation rates.  If Democrats are elected they inflate and real wages fall creating a boom.  If Republicans are elected they reduce inflation and real wages rise creating a bust.  Notice that in PBC theory neither party creates a boom or bust it's uncertainty which drives the result - if the winning party were known there would be neither boom nor bust.

Ok, there's plenty to question about the theory but let's look at the data.


Notice that in the second year of just about every Democratic Presidency there is a boom.  Interestingly, the boom is biggest for Truman whose reelection was highly uncertain (remember Dewey wins!) thus expected inflation would have been low and the boom big.  Similarly the boom is smallest (relative to the surrounding years) for Clinton II a relatively certain reelection.

Now look at Republicans in just about every second year of a Republican Presidency there is a bust.  The one major exception being Reagan II where uncertainty about the outcome was low.

It's pretty clear that this result can explain Bartels's result which is exactly Tyler's point in his post.   It's equally clear that when we consider Presidents there aren't many data points.  (PBC does appear to hold somewhat in other countries).

Notice that the reason for the result, according to PBC, is sticky wages and the business cycle and not some nefarious story about taxes, oligarchies and political conspiracies.

Beyonce's Sister Mum On Wedding Reports

CBS News - Found Apr. 8, 2008
Pop diva Beyonce Knowles' 21-year-old singer/actress sister, Solange, won't comment on her big sister's rumored wedding to Jay-Z. Solange, who is ...
The Crazy in love couple - Times of India
Jenice Armstrong: Beyonce, Jay-Z still mum on marriage - Philadelphia Inquirer
Beyonce and Jay-Z feast on caviar and fried chicken - Music-News
Explore All
Orange UK

More info on Zelda manga heading to NA

Viz isn’t talking about what Zelda manga is coming to the states, but they have confirmed a release date. We can look forward to October 7th as the first day where we can get our hands on a localized copy. While Viz wouldn’t confirm what manga they were bringing over, they did summarize the two volumes.

Volume 1

In the mystical land of Hyrule, three spiritual stones hold the key to the Triforce, and whoever holds them will control the world. A boy named Link sets out on a quest to deliver the Emerald, the spiritual stone of the forest, to Zelda, Princess of the land of Hyrule. The journey will be long and perilous, and Link will need all his skill and courage to defeat evil. The battle for Hyrule and the Sacred Realm has begun!

Volume 2
After completing his training Link begins his journey to seek the remaining Sages. Meanwhile, Ganondorf continues looking for Princess Zelda and plotting to capture Link with the aid of the witches known as Twinrova. At the urging of the mysterious Sheik, Link enters the Haunted Wasteland to find Zelda. The journey will be dangerous but Link is determined to overcome the Twinrova’s traps and survive to face Ganondorf in an epic final battle!

Link

Friday, April 11, 2008

eBay auction - SNES display model, GBA SP limited edition models

Auction here

Auction here

Link

Predictions about 2008

From 1968:

A typical vacation in 2008 is to spend a week at an undersea resort, where your hotel room window looks out on a tropical underwater reef, a sunken ship or an ancient, excavated city. Available to guests are two- and three-person submarines in which you can cruise well-marked underwater trails.

But many of the predictions are good, at least in part.  Get this:

The single most important item in 2008 households is the computer. These electronic brains govern everything from meal preparation and waking up the household to assembling shopping lists and keeping track of the bank balance. Sensors in kitchen appliances, climatizing units, communicators, power supply and other household utilities warn the computer when the item is likely to fail. A repairman will show up even before any obvious breakdown occurs.

Computers also handle travel reservations, relay telephone messages, keep track of birthdays and anniversaries, compute taxes and even figure the monthly bills for electricity, water, telephone and other utilities. Not every family has its private computer. Many families reserve time on a city or regional computer to serve their needs. The machine tallies up its own services and submits a bill, just as it does with other utilities.

Via www.geekpress.com.  As usual, it is presumed that traffic and transportation problems will have seen a lot of progress when in fact they have not.  Nor was it understood how unevenly the benefits of progress would be distributed and how possible it would be to continue a life basically devoid of these advances.

Striking out (by Russell Roberts)

Sometimes I get depressed about the quality of statistical work in economics. Then I read something from another social science. Here is a recent study where psychologists find that having the initial "K" increases your chance of striking out when playing professional baseball. Why? Well, it's obvious isn't it? The letter "K" is used when keeping score in baseball to represent striking out. So it's obvious now isn't it? Still don't get it? Neither do I. But hey, it's in the data. Between 1913 and 2006, players with first or last initial "K" struck out 18.8% of the time compared to 17.2% for the fortunate players unhandicapped by their initials. Here is the "explanation" of the authors:

Despite a universal desire to avoid striking out, K-initialed players strike out more often.  For those players, we argue that the explicitly negative performance outcome may feel implicitly  positive. Even Karl "Koley" Kolseth would find a strikeout aversive, but on the whole, he might  find it a little less aversive than players who do not share his initials, and avoid it less  enthusiastically.

But why? Why would having the initial "K" make striking out more pleasant? I just don't get it. The authors go on to "test" their theory by looking at grades of a sample of MBA students:

The MBA students in our sample are well aware of a direct connection between academic  performance and successful job placement. Nevertheless, despite the pervasive desire to achieve  high grades, students with an unconsciously-driven fondness for C's and D's were slightly less  successful at achieving their conscious goal.

That is, Charles Darwin received poorer grades than Alan Alda. But it turns out that Alan Alda didn't do better than the non-ABCD initialed:

Interestingly, A- or B-initialed students did not perform better than students whose  initials were grade-irrelevant. There are two possible explanations for this. First, students with  grade-irrelevant initials may already be maximally motivated to succeed. Second, because  performance is determined by motivation and ability, any increased motivation to succeed that  arises from having initials that match positive performance outcomes may not necessarily  translate into increased performance.

There is, of course, a third explanation: there is no real relationship and the authors have been fooled by randomness. Yes, their results are statistically significant. But how many relationships did they explore before finding the ones that were statistically significant. And ho many relationships are there to explore? To really test the theory, you'd have to look at baseball players with the initial "E" and see if they commit more errors than others. You'd have to look at guards in the NBA to see if those with initials "A" have more assists. Centers whose initials include an "R" should be better rebounders. You'd have to look and see whether students with the initials IC were more likely to take an "incomplete" in a class.

I guess Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi of England should have been a football player. Or maybe he just gets fired more often than the average Briton because it doesn't bother him as much as someone with a different last name.

Did Kafka know baseball scoring? Does this explain why he found success in life so difficult? Is this why he named a character "K"?

Do players whose initials are a backwards "K" strike out looking more than the average?

Navy SEAL died saving his buddies

CNN - Found 17 hours ago
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- When a grenade bounced off his chest and fell to the floor near his fellow troops, Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael Monsoor acted ...
Navy SEAL's sacrifice earns Medal of Honor - MSNBC
Navy SEAL paid ultimate price - CNN
VET'S ULTIMATE HONOR - New York Post
Explore All
AP

Fat Wednesday...

Well, we're back in Chicago -- I was "dismissed" yesterday morning, after my appointment with the doc. Here's where things stand...

1. The initial protein that the neurologist found in my blood, way the fuck back in January, was, strangely, NOT found in my blood at Mayo. I don't know if it disappeared, was never there in the first place, or if it only shows up in odd-numbered months, but it ain't there now. Apparently, that's a good thing.

B. All the rest of my blood looks clean. Red cells, white cells, Beverly Cells, platelets -- no problems. My heart looks good, my lungs look good, my reflexes look good, and my ass looks good... in jeans, but is a little soupy in khakis.

iii. They don't have the results back from the fat pad aspiration yet -- I'm supposed to call tomorrow at noon to see what's the shizzle. They'll also have the results of this genetic test that determines whether I have the inherited form of this fucker.

Basically, the doc is pretty dubious that I've got amyloidosis. He says my physical exam shows none of the symptoms of someone with it, there's no evidence, so far, in my blood/bone marrow/pee that would suggest that I have it, and the whole thing just doesn't fit. There may be amyloid in my fat sample, but he says that, regardless, that does not suggest that it's systemic, which is the really bad version of it. I suppose there's still the chance that I'd have the genetic form of it, which is really heinous, but signs aren't really pointing to that either.

So, I'm cautiously optimistic, but I'm not throwing any fucking parties until I talk to him tomorrow. It's kinda like there's one second left on the game clock, the shot has been taken, but the ball is just spinning around the rim endlessly, and it won't fall in or out. A "toilet-ringer," if you will.

The only question is, who's gonna be there for the tip-in -- Bill Cartwright or Will Perdue.

GameTrailers update

Iron Man ’story’

English of the Dead trailer

Deadly Creatures interview

Neil Diamond to perform at Fenway Park

MSNBC - Found 21 hours ago
BOSTON - Neil Diamond will perform in concert this summer at Fenway Park.The singer made the announcement in a big-screen broadcast at the Boston Red ...
Buckner's Fenway return incredibly 'emotional' - MSNBC
Dice-K and Red Sox drop Tigers to 0-7 - MSNBC
Buckner gets warm reception in Fenway return - CNN
Explore All
AP

Haitian prison

If international minimum standards of about four square metres for every prisoner were met, the National Penitentiary would hold a little more than 400 inmates. On the day Maclean's visits the prison, there are 3,331 men jailed inside. Most, at least 90 per cent, have not had a trial. They are held under the euphemistic term "preventative detention," and because of a lack of judges, proper evidence, and even vehicles to transport them to court, it is unlikely many will be tried any time soon. "People sleep on top of people in here," one prisoner says through the bars of a bathroom-sized cell that holds 43 people. Most are standing. Others have fashioned hammocks out of scraps of cloth and have suspended themselves from the bars of the cell's high window, where they can get more light and air...

Here is more.  And that is not all:

There is a punishment cell, perhaps four feet tall, where no one can stand. The punishment cell is crowded, but less so than other cells, and some inmates prefer it. "You have people who do things wrong just so they have a place to lie down or to be safe from gangs," Cadet says.

Here is a video about recent food riots in Haiti, and no those are not in the prisons.

American cancels more than 1,000 more...

CNN - Found 3 hours ago
DALLAS, Texas (AP) -- American Airlines canceled more than 1,000 flights Wednesday, more than one-third of its schedule, as it spent a second ...
Flight cancellations may last into summer - Fortune
AA's Wednesday cancelations top 1,000 - USA Today
Poniard Pharma To Present Data From Phase 2 Study Of Picoplatin In ... - RTTNews.com
Explore All
AP

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Living Scared

Sometimes the answers to our problems are not nearly as complex or elusive as many of us seem to believe they are. Or as difficult as some of us make them. Sometimes our problems only exist in our head. Sometimes the journey from where we are to where we’d like to be is not nearly as terrifying as we imagine it is. In fact, it’s often kind of exhilarating and liberating.

Living Scared

That’s right; some of us make life hard. Our inability to make certain decisions or do certain things keeps us trapped in a reality that we don’t enjoy. Hate, in fact. And standing at the door of our self-created prison is a gate-keeper who only exists in our mind; fear. While other people can walk in and out of our prison (reality) at will, fear has kept some of us from freedom for far too long - telling us what to do, and what not to do, for as long as we can remember. Influencing, if not controlling virtually every area of our lives. For years we’ve been fearful of getting hurt in some way, fearful of getting fat, or being unloved, unwanted, poor, humiliated, of upsetting people or being discovered for the fraud we believe we are. And we’re petrified of being alone. We’ve lived so much of our life negatively, simply doing our best to avoid the ‘bad stuff’ and to survive, that somewhere along the way, we seem to have lost, or maybe never even really found, us; the us we still want to be, the us we could be and the us we’ve dreamed about since we were five.

It’s okay, you’re still in there.

Sometimes the seemingly insurmountable gap between our current reality and our own version of amazing (prison and freedom) is much smaller than we think. Much, much smaller. A mere step away in fact. With the only challenge being that sometimes the step we need to take is a doozy; the ‘no safety net’ step. And we love safety nets - that’s a big part of the problem.

Fear is a jealous gate-keeper and he wants you staying put in your make-believe prison. That’s how he operates. He doesn’t want you to see what’s out there, what’s possible for you. He can’t keep you in there but only he knows that. He’s been holding a pair of threes while you’ve had four aces in your hand for years, but he’s bluffed you every time. Stared you down, made you believe something that wasn’t true - that what you have in your hand isn’t good enough. Well listen up…

It is good enough. You are good enough.

This is not feel-good, positive thinking mumbo jumbo, its reality. But you need to make it YOUR reality. Fear doesn’t want you making decisions, taking chances or exploring your potential because that’s where he loses his power. He doesn’t want you hanging out with those ‘positive thinking’ types and he certainly doesn’t want you paying too much attention to articles like this one.

Healthy and unhealthy fear

Of course there’s a time to fear. If someone is pointing a gun at you and you are fearful, then that makes you normal, not gutless. We would call that healthy fear. But that’s not what we’re talking about today. Today we’re talking about the unhealthy, destructive and often irrational fear that controls and ruins lives.

Fearful creatures

People often ask me what I believe stops so many of us from fulfilling our potential and from creating our best life. In truth, there are many things on the list of likely obstacles: procrastination, laziness, ignorance, indifference, ego and a bunch of other stuff, but without doubt, at the top of most lists, is fear.

It’s true; we humans are fearful creatures. On some level we all operate on fear from time to time, and to a point, that’s understandable. Wise even. But beyond a point, it’s stupid. Destructive even. It’s about knowing where that line in the sand should be and staying on the right side. A little fear - good. A life controlled by fear - bad. Painful.

Far too many of our significant ‘life decisions’ come out of our fearful mindset, and as a consequence, many of us live a life of compromise, under-achievement and imprisonment. And repetition. And repetition. It’s like some of us are Bill Murray in Groundhog Day. And repetition. All of our days are just like the ones before. And sadly for some, tomorrow will be the same too. Because that’s what we do; the same - even though we desperately want different. The journey between where we are and where we want to be scares the crap out of us so we stay put. In Samesville. A.K.A. prison.

“I don’t really like my life right now, but at least there’s a level of familiarity and predictability about it. I know what’s coming each day and in a way, I’m comfortable with that. It doesn’t particularly fulfill me but it doesn’t terrify me either. So if it’s okay with you, I’ll stay here in a holding pattern for forty or fifty years and then I’ll die, just like dear old Dad did. There won’t be a whole lot of joy or fun, but at least I know what to expect each day.”

We love certainty (a dangerous thing to love in a uncertain world), we’re addicted to safety, we seek familiarity and we want risk-free (good luck with that). Ironically certainty, safety, familiarity and risk-free… is not where we grow, learn, adapt, change or improve. Or find our best life. In fact, quite often the things that we gravitate towards are our biggest handicap.

I have spent a lifetime watching people complicate the simple, avoid the obvious and not do the very things they should or could have done, long ago. Some people have been almost creating their best life for far too long. Some people have been standing at the threshold of greatness for years, twiddling their thumbs, wasting their time and talent and hoping in vain that success might somehow find it’s way to them. An interesting, if not totally unrealistic notion.

Some people have been in situations or circumstances that they really don’t want to be in, for years. Decades even. This is because they associate more discomfort / pain with getting out of their current reality, than staying in it. So they stay. Miserable and scared.

Some Personal Development Junkies are masters of this. Just one more workshop, one more conversation, one more mentoring session, one more self-help book and just one more day and then I’ll do it. Okay, maybe two more days. Sadly, they don’t understand that what they really need is not more time, books, workshops or more motivational fluff, what they really need is some balls. Excuse my honesty but some people are highly educated, very capable, extremely talented and gutless. I’ve met many of them. Give me someone with less talent, less opportunities, more adversity and some genuine courage, and I’ll show you how to get some real results.

I know this is not a message that’s often taught in personal development circles but I believe that’s a big mistake. I believe it should be shouted from the roof tops. We like to gravitate towards the feel-good (but mostly useless and disempowering) psycho-babble crap. It makes us feel warm and fuzzy for ten minutes but results in no long term positive change. Of course I believe there is a time for listening, for handing holding, for back rubbing, for hugging and for loving support and encouragement. The problem is, some people have had all of that for years and they’re STILL in the same place and still doing the same destructive things. Sometimes more therapy ain’t the answer. I know that’s not a popular thing to say but it’s true. There’s a time when some people need to suck it up, to stop looking for pity, to stop being a victim and start taking control of their own life. Simple.

Courage

So often we are taught that creating our best life is about talent, opportunities, planning, goal setting, vision, passion, discipline and a bunch of other stuff. And to an extent it is; it’s about all of those things. But there’s one non-negotiable ingredient that doesn’t get the attention it should; courage. Our ability to do what we need to do, despite the fear. If we have all of the ingredients but no courage, we’ll never get there. Wherever there is for us.

Fear and all it’s implications in the lives of us mere mortals is something which has fascinated me for years. I have watched it ruin many friendships, careers, businesses, marriages and lives. I have seen it destroy individuals. Like most emotions, on some level, we create it. It’s very personal and individual. It’s a personal response to, or interpretation of, an event, situation or circumstance.

I’ve also watched many people stare-down and overcome their fears and enjoy a life of happiness, joy and exhilaration that only comes with true freedom. I’ve seen brave people turn their lives around after years of frustration and sadness. And I’ve seen ordinary people do incredible things because they chose to walk out of that prison cell. Once and for all.

Remember…

On the other side of fear is freedom.

Enjoy your liberty my friend.
You deserve it and you’re worth it.


Craig Harper (B.Ex.Sci.) is a qualified exercise scientist, author, columnist, radio presenter, television host, motivational speaker and university lecturer. For the past 25 years he has been a leading presenter, educator, motivator and commentator in the areas of personal and professional development. You can visit Craig's blog at Motivational Speaker.

Related Posts

  • Exploring Happiness
  • 10 HARD Ways to Make Your Life Better
  • How to Become a Pop Star
  • 13 Tips to Zap Your Butterflies When Speaking in Public
  • Don’t Panic! Stop Worrying and Enjoy Halloween
  • How to Be Happier with What You Have
  • Eighteen Ways to Invest in Life
  • 5 Things You Don’t Want To Know About Self-Improvement
  • Get Going With The Morita Therapy
  • Five Productivity Ideas I’m Not Buying (Yet?)
  • 10 Quick Tips To Boost Self-Esteem
  • Strengths-Based Personal Development
  • How to Become a Creative Genius
  • How to get over your fear of public speaking
  • What we have most to fear is fear itself

Microsoft Vision of our Healthcare Future

Again, not new- but new to me:

The ubiquitous computing concepts shown in the video make someone like me drool. It would seem that the future is flat, rectilinear, and white with pastel accents1.

Still, do you see anything in this video that really strikes you as revolutionary for healthcare …or is it all just really cool-looking?


1 I’m married to a design historian, I can’t help it. Sorry.

Why MPs Halls Of Residence Will Not Catch On

With all the debates about Parliamentarians and their expenses at the moment, I was rather interested about the idea that was being mooted about creating halls of residence accommodation for the MPs.

Actually, only moderately interested, because there is no way on earth it is actually going to happen - even if MPs agreed to it (which they won't), the cost to provide the accommodation would be extortionate.

But for some reason it seems that cost has long gone out of the window as a prime motivator for suggested changes to the Parliamentary expenses system. Some people for example just want to show that expenses are not being abused - and don't actually care about any saving to the tax payer at all.

Take Theresa May's suggestion that to stop a minority of MPs "abusing" the £400 second home allowance (and when I say "abuse", I use that term in the sense of using an allowance completely within the rules that are set out) - she thinks the way that you stop that is to give all MPs a salary rise so they don't feel they have to abuse the system.

It is the rules that actually need looking at, not the perceived "abuse" of them, but May's proposal would actually cost the taxpayer more - and those MPs "abusing" the second home allowance would still be able to spend £400 on the things they did before (or anything else they want) and it's OK because it won't be termed as expenses!

The same is true with those advocating buying or building accommodation in Central London to house 65o-odd MPs and their families. How much do the Taxpayers' Alliance think that this idea will cost? I would have thought billions of pounds on current estimates. And then a massive sum on top for security measures to protect such an obvious terrorist target outside the secure area of the Parliamentary Estate. I suspect that the cost would be far higher than allowing MPs to claim for hotels in London or a contribution to the mortgage on a second home that we currently have.

And wouldn't having all these MPs living in halls of residence be a disaster waiting to happen?

Can you imagine elected members sitting around till 3 in the morning listening to Bob Marley and The Levellers, as David Cameron comes in and tells everyone to listen to his new whizzo album by The Smiths? Fine dining in the Commons replaced by snack bars selling kit-kats and pot noodles as people get the munchies? Debates in the House about who ate all the cheese in the fridge (that was clearly labelled), who's turn it is to top up the electricity meter and who's turn it is to do the washing up?

I think Parliament, and the country, should be saved from such a spectacle - but if it goes ahead, expect Endemol to want to buy the rights to televise a fly on the wall programme presented by Davina McCall/Dermot O'Leary. :-/
-
(Photo Source: Havaska, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Hotnoodle.jpg)

BNP Views On Rape Are Total Bull

So it seems that a prominent member of the BNP has backed wife-beating and described rape as a "myth" saying women "would be more inconvenienced by having her handbag snatched" and compared it to "being force fed chocolate cake".

That is simply incredible and horrific statement, even for the BNP.

In the article entitled "Give Her A Slap!", Nick Ericksen - who is number two on the BNP list for the GLA elections in London - said:

"I've never understood why so many men have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by the feminazi myth machine into believing that rape is such a serious crime...Rape is simply sex. Women enjoy sex, so rape cannot be such a terrible physical ordeal.

"To suggest that rape, when conducted without violence, is a serious crime is like suggesting that forcefeeding a woman chocolate cake is a heinous offence. A woman would be more inconvenienced by having her handbag snatched.

"The demonisation of rape is all part of the feminazi desire to obtain power and mastery over men. Men who go along with the rape myth are either morons or traitors."

Absolutely disgusting claims, and another good reason not to vote BNP if they put candidates in your area.

I notice Nick Ericksen was blogging under the pseudonym "Sir John Bull".

Load of old bull, more like.
-
(Image Source: Screen grab of article from Sir John Bull website)

Problems With Admin At Anglia?

Having watched this video tonight, I had to have a little chuckle to myself.

Problems with admin at Anglia Ruskin University? Surely not.

As you may know, I graduated from Anglia Ruskin University about 10 years ago. It was called Anglia Polytechnic University then - the only Polytechnic in the the country at the time, and I used to joke that it was there on merit - at least now they've managed to change the name, if not some of the problems people experience.

The university itself has been immortalised on TV twice as far as I am aware. Once when Griff Rhys Jones played a lecturer in Wilt (the writer was a lectuerer at the Poly) and once in The Young Ones as "Scumbag Poly" in the University Challenge edition against "Footlights College, Oxbridge".

Don't get me wrong, I loved my university years. The lecturers were great, the courses were brilliant and the staff were always friendly and accommodating. There were no pretentions and the uni years were undoubtedly some of the best of my life.

But the one thing that let it down was admin. Well admin and organisation - two things.

The two week wait for a timetable was not unusual in my day. I can remember in 1995, my first year at university, that one student did not get his timetable till week 6. Now that may sound quite bad, but it is worth remembering that at that we had 12 week terms at that time!

I had presumed that these were passing problems, or that it was a problem experienced by an individual student - indeed I have nothing to suggest the problems were widespread. However what a good university should do is talk to the student and resolve the matter amicably.

The fact that this current student seems to have been threatened with legal action and banned from the campus seems a massive over-reaction. Anglia, please sort this situation out - you currently have a reputation as a good university that puts it's students needs (academic and personal) first - and this row will do nothing for any of the people concerned.
-
(BTW did you know that Tory donor Michael Ashcroft not only went to Anglia back in the day, he has been Chancellor of Anglia Ruskin University since November 2001, and has donated £5 million for the university's business school at Chelmsford, now called Ashcroft International Business School. I did, but most people I talk to didn't. I am sure that has absolutely nothing to do with the outrage being expressed on the Tory blogs today.)

I'm So Worried About The Baggage Retrieval System They've Got At Heathrow

As something of a worrier by nature and a fan of Monty Python, I have always enjoyed the Terry Jones song I'm So Worried.

As a youngster listening to this song, I probably shared many of the fears being sung about in the song. However I never really got the reference to "the baggage retrieval system they've got at Heathrow". This was mainly due to the fact that we could never have afforded to fly anywhere when I was that age - the most exotic holiday I can remember was the annual trip (by train and boat) to the Isle of Man - so the observation rather went over my head.

It's funny how 30-40 years on the song is probably at its aptest this week. You take your luggage to Heathrow and it ends up in Milan!

How post-modern, we are now getting to the stage where your luggage gets a better holiday than you do as a passenger.

Yes, I'm so worried about the baggage retrieval system they've got at Heathrow. :-/

Let's just hope it's not a "terminal" problem. ;-)
-

Local Elections - Temporary Alterations

As we are now into the local election period, I am legally obliged to put on an "imprint" on this site - which I have done above - but it is worth saying:

a) This website is not a campaign website and should not be treated as such. The views contained in it remain my own personal views and are not necessarily the views of the Labour and Co-operative Parties, or other individuals, bodies or organisations I have connections to.

and

b) The imprint will come back down after the election, no matter the result.

Interesting that I have a BNP candidate standing against me - clearly they didn't have the intelligence/ability to stand in the wards they claimed they were going to.

Racism will never win the day and, as I have said previously, I hope that people in South Oxhey unite to defeat the vile BNP - as they always have done in the past.
-
(Image Source: The Labour Party)

MPs Videoed Swinging

With all that news of Nick Clegg-over possibly sleeping with up to 30 people, you have to worry when you hear that a couple of MPs have been videoed swinging.

But watch the evidence here.

It's a relief, isn't it?

I bet all those journos were just hoping beyond hope that one of them fell off - although I like Andy Burnham's heckle as Ed Balls jumps off:

"Can you hear the wood creaking there?"

With friends like that, eh...

Anyway, how smooth is Ed Balls' dismount? Two related questions:

1) Has he done this before.
2) Can we make it an Olympic Sport before 2012.
-
(Photo Source: Jon Pallbo, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:A_playground_swing.jpg)

What's Your Favourite Eurovision Song?

I am a big fan of the Eurovision Song Contest and can't wait for the final next month in Belgrade (although I understand new European country Kosovo will not be taking part).

Yes, it's kitsch and a bit rubbish but isn't that one of the reasons we love it? (Well, that and Terry Wogan ripping it to shreds every year!) But I thought it might be fun to ask readers what their all time favourite Eurovision song is.

For British entries I find it hard to see beyond the brilliant dance routines and Spanish holiday entertainer costumes of Brotherhood of Man with Save Your Kisses For Me, or the sheer 80s-ness and skirt ripping of Bucks Fizz's Making Your Mind Up.

But outside of UK entries, my favourite from all my years of watching is undoubtedly Denmark's high-tempo folky foot-tapper from 2001, so I thought I'd share that with you.

Rollo & King - Never Ever Let You Go.

A Barenaked Ladies style track that somehow failed to win, despite having great harmonies, great lyrics, a harmonica interlude by a guy in a leather jacket, a beautiful woman doing a theatrical stage entrance halfway through and (most importantly) someone jauntily strumming a ukuelele!

Great atmosphere too, as the contest was in Copenhagen that year - although Estonia ended up winning with a much inferior song. Another example of rigged voting no doubt, that still pains me to this day...and they say it's all trivial? ;-)

Now, where did I put my ukuelele...
-

Nick Clegg-over

You have to be careful with some of the news reports that come out on 1st April, but I am rather shocked by the GQ interview with Nick Clegg where he goes into some detail about his love-life and ability in the bedroom.

Frankly, I don't want to know. I only hope he took his sandals off first.

I should probably remind you that Nick Clegg is leader of the Lib Dems this week, in case you've forgotten who he is. He revealed all (snigger, snigger) in an interview with former Mirror editor Piers Morgan. Perhaps Clegg was just auditioning for the next series of Britain's Got Talent without understanding what the title of the programme actually meant?

Given Clegg's recent interview disaster with The Big Issue, don't you think that those in control of the Lib Dems should stop him doing any further interviews for the foreseeable future?

But then you forget that no-one is actually in control of the Lib Dems anymore.
-

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Saying Two Things At Once

Attended the Christian Socialist Movement AGM and Tawney Lecture/Dialogue last night (although I suppose as Vice Chair there is no getting out of it even if I wanted to). Packed to the rafters it was.

Whilst there were fascinating contributions from both Stephen Timms MP and Rev Canon Nick Sagovsky, I was rather more struck by one of the contributions made from the audience.

"We need faith in action", shouted one woman. A hearty "hear hear" echoed round the room.

Or did she actually shout "we need faith inaction"? There is a rather different meaning behind that suggestion, isn't there?

It's hard to tell, considering the two phrases sound the same, though they mean polar opposites.

I guess the appropriate reaction to the latter comment would be a universal shrug from the audience rather than showing positive approval though.
-

Tory Mould On The Environment

Anyone heard of a guy called Stephen Mould?

No, I thought not, but it seems he is the Tories' Parliamentary Candidate in Derby North.

I was rather interested by the page of his website talking about the environment.

According to Stephen we need "to meet the great environmental threats of the age, to enhance the environment and to increase general well-being" and "today that means: Playing our part in tackling climate change by encouraging green growth through binding annual targets for carbon reduction, a long-term price for carbon, and the removal of barriers that hold us back from leading the world in new green technologies".

All absolutely laudable I am sure you agree.

I thought I'd even over-look the fact that the man opposes introducing a congestion charge to help address the over-use of cars in Derby City Centre and the effect that this causes on the enviroment - as I am sure he is passionate about the environment and is doing his own bit to tackle climate change.

I then had a look at the biog on his website and his list of interests:

"Stephen's interests include Formula 1 racing, motor cruising & flying small aircraft. Stephen & Nikki qualified for their RYA Day Skipper Qualification only last year. This year Stephen began learning to fly and hopes to gain his Private Pilot's License soon".

Do the Tories actually believe anything they say anymore?

It reminds me of David Cameron's announcement that he wanted to do something about reducing the number of flights taken in the UK because of the effect they had on the environment - but then only referred to short haul flights (often taken by the low paid) and not long haul flights (often taken by Tory businessmen).

That is David Cameron who's disgust for short haul flights is such that he and the rest of the Shadow Cabinet all flew to Scotland on a short haul flight for a meeting instead of the option of taking the train.

Perhaps he just heard how bad the trains to Scotland can be?

There is a Mould in the Tory Party, and everyone should be aware of it.
-

Free Scoring Shoulders And Shoddy Exhausts

Played footy on a Saturday morning for the first time in ages this weekend - too many Council advice surgeries, kilts to buy, and other exciting things to do in recent weeks - and it was a great game as we came from 2-0 down against one of the best sides in the league to draw 2-2.

But we all know that a 2-0 lead is the hardest score to have in football, so perhaps a 2-2 draw was not that surprising a result at that point.

And 2-2 draws are always more satisfying than 2-0 draws, I find.

Playing on pitch at right back (in the changing room, haha!) I even scored the first goal in the comeback - but was rather more impressed by goal line clearance at 2-0 down. The centre forward rounded the keeper and smashed the ball full force at the goal - I just stood there and manfully powered the ball off the line with my head, grunting like a Neanderthal as I repelled the shot upfield and chased the follow up. They shall not pass.

It was at this point, about 30 seconds after the impact of the shot that the adrenalin finally wore off and I just stood there with my head spinning, promising myself I would never be so stupid as to stop the ball with my head ever again. (Although in fairness the spinning head could have been due to the fact that our kit hadn't been washed from last week and probably could have been reclassified as chemically hazardous had a Government Inspector inspected it at the weekend. :-/)

But back to my goal. A glorious, well placed, looping effort into the far corner off my shoulder. I think the keeper was done for pace (a severe lack of it) as he attempted to flap it away. Not a lot of people are good enough to be able to score with their shoulder, a lot of people claimed it was a fluke, but when Cristiano Ronaldo tries it next weekend then you'll see the genius of it.

In fact I think my shoulder is probably the freest scoring shoulder in the whole of the league. It is potent. More deadly potent than even our kit. Respect my shoulder. ;-)

The other interesting thing from the game on Saturday was that on the way back the exhaust fell off my car. Now a lot of people will think this is coincidental, but it made me think back to the last time my exhaust blew up - again on that occasion I had scored a goal. Actually it was two goals that game.

So goodness only knows what will happen if I ever score a hat-trick!
-
(BTW this photo is just a helpful aid to let you know what my free scoring shoulder may look like - the picture wasn't taken on Saturday. Actually, it's my other shoulder that scored at the weekend, so perhaps I am just trying to lull people into a false sense of security about my secret weapon. The other shoulder is frightening...some say awesome...too awesome for a mere photograph on this blog. ;-))