Friday, May 2, 2008
Technology in the Home – Australia is Lagging with The Very Good Idea of Supporting Patient’s Health in their Home.
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
NEHTA Fantasises About the Contribution of Outgoing CEO.
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
Useful and Interesting Health IT Links from the Last Week – 30/03/2008
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
What Does the Acting NEHTA CEO Need to do Pronto?
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
Dr Ian Reinecke Resigns – Oh Happy Day!
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
ScriptX – Just What is it and Where is This Heading?
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
Computerised Physician Order Entry (CPOE) – A Vital In Hospital Technology
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
It Looks Like NEHTA has Missed Out on Shared EHR Funding!
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
NEHTA’s Future – The Article from Pulse+IT March 2008 – With an Update
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
The AHIC Future Directions Paper is Hopelessly Misconceived and Already Obsolete.
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
Useful and Interesting Health IT Links from the Last Week – 23/03/2008
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
Rapid Learning – Using the EHR to Make a Real Difference!
This is the initial part of the post - read more by clicking on the title of the article. David.
PubGet (3rd Party PubMed/MEDLINE Tool)
The idea behind Pubget is that it speeds up the process of grabbing the full-text PDFs from PubMed search results. The video below illustrates the idea:
Above: Embedded video. If you are reading this in an aggregator, you may need to visit the site to view the video.
If you’re at one of the following institutions, you can try a full-featured Pubget that links to full-text PDFs available to these institutions:
- MIT
- Harvard University
- Harvard Medical School
- University of Queensland
- Massachusetts General Hospital
From Pubget’s public site, you can get a feel for how it works, but it’ll only pull up open access PDFs.
To keep up on new developments, you can subscribe to the feed of the Pubget blog.
Interested in getting this service for your library’s users? Get in touch and let them know you’re interested.
WikiEcho (cardiography wiki)
Added to the list of medical wikis:
WikiEcho
Self-description: “Wikiecho is a project to create a free, up-to-date and reliable online resource covering the rapidly advancing field of echocardiography.”
Intended Audience/Users: “This website is intended to be used by medical students, residents, physicians, cardiology fellows, cardiologists and cardiac sonographers.”
Contributors: Anyone who registers.
Editors/Administrators: Not listed.
Editorial Policies: Minimal, available here.
Web Geekery in Recent Literature: 4/3/08
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr;5(4):593-7.
Quality of CT colonography-related web sites for consumers.
Sheran J, Dachman AH.
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
PURPOSE: Patients often request to undergo computed tomographic colonography (CTC) from radiologists or referring physicians on the basis of their personal examination of information on the Web. Therefore, the authors examined the information on CTC and virtual colonoscopy available for consumers on the Web to assess its quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The term virtual colonoscopy was entered into 3 popular search engines: Google, Yahoo, and MSN. In each case, evaluation was limited to the first 50 Web sites, or hits, which were recorded and analyzed for content, comprehensiveness, and accuracy. RESULTS: Sixty-seven Web sites were deemed appropriate for further analysis. More than half of the sites reported currency dates more than 2 years old. Only a third of the sites included information about the risk factors for colorectal cancer. About a third of the sites did not explain the indications for the use of CTC, and the remaining sites lacked consistent descriptions of the indications. Few Web sites offered or described the option of performing same-day optical colonoscopy for patients with abnormal results on CTC. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that patients are often armed with very incomplete information from Web sites on CTC. Web sites were often found to be outdated, to contain conflicting information, and were lacking descriptions of patient risk factors for colorectal cancer. Several suggestions are made to improve the dissemination of comprehensive, current, and accurate information.
PMID: 18359448
_____________________________
Hum Reprod. 2008 Mar 27 [Epub ahead of print]
Infertility information on the World Wide Web: a cross-sectional survey of quality of infertility information on the internet in the UK.
Marriott JV, Stec P, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Braude P, Coomarasamy A.
Assisted Conception Unit, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Guy House, Guys Hospital, 4th Floor, London SE1 9RT, UK.
BACKGROUND The internet is a frequently used source of information for infertile couples. Previous studies suggested that the quality of health information on the internet is poor. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of websites providing information on infertility and its management in the UK. Differences between website types and affiliations were assessed. METHODS A Google search for the keyword ‘infertility’ was performed and 107 relevant websites were identified and categorized by type. Websites were assessed for credibility, accuracy and ease of navigation using predefined criteria. RESULTS The total scores for all types of websites were low, particularly in the accuracy category. Websites affiliated to the UK National Health Service (NHS) scored higher than those affiliated to private fertility clinics and other clinics providing non-conventional fertility treatment. Specifically, NHS websites were more likely to report success rates (92.9% versus 60% and 0%, P PMID: 18372253
_____________________________
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Feb 15;72(1):10.
Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education. [Free full text]
Cain J.
University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, USA.
Online social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace are extremely popular as indicated by the numbers of members and visits to the sites. They allow students to connect with users with similar interests, build and maintain relationships with friends, and feel more connected with their campus. The foremost criticisms of online social networking are that students may open themselves to public scrutiny of their online personas and risk physical safety by revealing excessive personal information. This review outlines issues of online social networking in higher education by drawing upon articles in both the lay press and academic publications. New points for pharmacy educators to consider include the possible emergence of an “e-professionalism” concept; legal and ethical implications of using online postings in admission, discipline, and student safety decisions; how online personas may blend into professional life; and the responsibility for educating students about the risks of online social networking.
PMID: 18322572
_____________________________
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):441-4.
SCAI launches seconds-count.org: An interventional cardiology resource for patients and physicians.
Weiner BH, Marshall JJ.
St Vincent Hospital at Worcester Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01608, USA. president@scai.org
PMID: 18288740
[Okay, not a lot in the abstract, but check out the site.]
JANE, eTBLAST, and Whatizit
When I posted in February about JANE, I should also have mentioned eTBLAST(previously mentioned here):
Our service is very different from PubMed. While PubMed searches for “keywords”, our search engine lets you input an entire paragraph and returns MEDLINE abstracts that are similar to it. This is something like PubMed’s “Related Articles” feature, only better because it runs on your unique set of interests. For example, input the abstract of an unpublished paper or a grant proposal into our engine, and with the touch of a button you’ll be able to find every abstract in MEDLINE dealing with your topic. No more guessing whether your set of keywords has found all the right papers. No more sorting through hundreds of papers you don’t care about to find the handful you were looking for–our search engine does it for you.
I also recently stumbled across Whatizit:
Whatizit is a text processing system that allows you to do textmining tasks on text. The tasks come defined by the pipelines in the drop down list of the above window and the text can be pasted in the text area. The description of each individual task/pipeline can be found following the link next to the submit button. Whatizit is also a Medline abstracts retrieval/search engine. Instead of providing the text by Copy&Paste, you can launch a Medline search. The abstracts that match your search critetia are retrieved and processed by a pipeline of your choice.
Microsoft Vision of our Healthcare Future
Again, not new- but new to me:
The ubiquitous computing concepts shown in the video make someone like me drool. It would seem that the future is flat, rectilinear, and white with pastel accents1.
Still, do you see anything in this video that really strikes you as revolutionary for healthcare …or is it all just really cool-looking?
1
Online Recruitment Dips in March, According to the Monster Employment Index UK
Nothing Unbalanced About So-called "Trade Deficits" (by Don Boudreaux)
In this recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, Dartmouth economist Matthew Slaughter describes some of the benefits of foreign direct investment (FDI). Here's an important part of his essay:
Foreign direct investment (FDI) has long been a source of strength for the American economy. In 2005, insourcing companies employed nearly 5.1 million Americans, 4.4% of the private-sector labor force. Beyond their employment, insourcing companies perform large amounts of the crucial activities that make their workers and the overall economy more productive. They invest in physical capital and in research and development, and they help connect the U.S. to the global economy through international trade. The bottom line is larger paychecks. In 2005, compensation per worker at insourcing companies was $66,042 -- 31.8% above the average for the rest of the private sector of $50,124.
I do, though, pick one (admittedly small) nit with Mr. Slaughter's exposition, as I explain in this letter that I sent to the WSJ:
Bravo for Matthew Slaughter's outstanding explanation of the pattern and enormous benefits of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the United States ("What Tata Tells Us," March 27).
I've one nit to pick: Mr. Slaughter incautiously aids and comforts protectionists when he writes that FDI today is driven by "the evolving pattern of global imbalances." While incoming FDI does indeed increase America's current-account deficit and many other countries' current-account surpluses, there's nothing unbalanced - either in the sense of being unsustainable or of being harmful - about America's attractiveness to investors, or about foreigners being especially keen to invest their dollars in the U.S. rather than spend these dollars on American-produced goods and services. Indeed, as Mr. Slaughter ably explains, such actions by foreigners are a great boon to foreigners and Americans alike.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
"Earth Hour" and the Dark Ages (by Don Boudreaux)
The World Wildlife Fund arranged today's "Earth Hour" -- a pledge by many people from around the world to turn off lights for an hour. The following is from a page on the WWF website:
Earth Hour is a global event created to symbolize that each one of us, working together, can make a positive impact on climate change - no matter who we are or where we live.
Created by WWF in Sydney, Australia in 2007, Earth Hour has grown from a single event into a global movement. In 2008, millions of people, businesses, governments and civic organizations in nearly 200 cities around the globe will turn out for Earth Hour. More than 35 US cities will participate, including the US flagships--Atlanta, Chicago, Phoenix and San Francisco.
Earth Hour brings together communities, local governments, corporate and nongovernmental organizations to heighten awareness about climate change and to inspire our nation to take practical actions to reduce their own carbon footprints.
Reading about the WWF's "Earth Hour" -- and hearing on the radio and t.v. too many mindless endorsements of this stunt, and seeing Google's special black "Earth Hour" design for its opening page today -- I sent the following letter to Carter Roberts, President of the WWF:
Dear Mr. Roberts:
You and members of your organization worry that industrialization and economic growth are harming the earth's environment. I worry that the intensifying hysteria about the state of the environment - and that the resulting hostility to economic growth - might harm humankind's prospects for comfortable, healthy, enjoyable, and long lives.
So I commend you on your "Earth Hour" effort. Persuading people across the globe to turn off lights for one hour supplies the perfect symbol for modern environmentalism: a collective effort to return humankind to the dark ages.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
By the way, of course, the WWF should award some special prize to the North Korean government, for that government keeps North Koreans not in any meager "Earth Hour," or even "Earth Day," but in what WWFers might call "Earth Decades" -- very little light ever. This picture of the Korean peninsula speaks volumes -- the Dark Ages today; a society keeping its carbon footprint tiny. Of course, in doing so it keeps itself also desperately poor, often even to the point of starvation.
Striking out (by Russell Roberts)
Sometimes I get depressed about the quality of statistical work in economics. Then I read something from another social science. Here is a recent study where psychologists find that having the initial "K" increases your chance of striking out when playing professional baseball. Why? Well, it's obvious isn't it? The letter "K" is used when keeping score in baseball to represent striking out. So it's obvious now isn't it? Still don't get it? Neither do I. But hey, it's in the data. Between 1913 and 2006, players with first or last initial "K" struck out 18.8% of the time compared to 17.2% for the fortunate players unhandicapped by their initials. Here is the "explanation" of the authors:
Despite a universal desire to avoid striking out, K-initialed players strike out more often. For those players, we argue that the explicitly negative performance outcome may feel implicitly positive. Even Karl "Koley" Kolseth would find a strikeout aversive, but on the whole, he might find it a little less aversive than players who do not share his initials, and avoid it less enthusiastically.
But why? Why would having the initial "K" make striking out more pleasant? I just don't get it. The authors go on to "test" their theory by looking at grades of a sample of MBA students:
The MBA students in our sample are well aware of a direct connection between academic performance and successful job placement. Nevertheless, despite the pervasive desire to achieve high grades, students with an unconsciously-driven fondness for C's and D's were slightly less successful at achieving their conscious goal.
That is, Charles Darwin received poorer grades than Alan Alda. But it turns out that Alan Alda didn't do better than the non-ABCD initialed:
Interestingly, A- or B-initialed students did not perform better than students whose initials were grade-irrelevant. There are two possible explanations for this. First, students with grade-irrelevant initials may already be maximally motivated to succeed. Second, because performance is determined by motivation and ability, any increased motivation to succeed that arises from having initials that match positive performance outcomes may not necessarily translate into increased performance.
There is, of course, a third explanation: there is no real relationship and the authors have been fooled by randomness. Yes, their results are statistically significant. But how many relationships did they explore before finding the ones that were statistically significant. And ho many relationships are there to explore? To really test the theory, you'd have to look at baseball players with the initial "E" and see if they commit more errors than others. You'd have to look at guards in the NBA to see if those with initials "A" have more assists. Centers whose initials include an "R" should be better rebounders. You'd have to look and see whether students with the initials IC were more likely to take an "incomplete" in a class.
I guess Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi of England should have been a football player. Or maybe he just gets fired more often than the average Briton because it doesn't bother him as much as someone with a different last name.
Did Kafka know baseball scoring? Does this explain why he found success in life so difficult? Is this why he named a character "K"?
Do players whose initials are a backwards "K" strike out looking more than the average?
More on Bartels
I'm a little surprised that the Bartels result is receiving so much attention because the result, in slightly different form, has long been known to political economists under the rubric of partisan business cycle theory. In a nutshell, the theory of partisan business cycles says that Democrats care more about reducing unemployment, Republicans care more about reducing inflation. Wage growth is set according to expected inflation in advance of an election. Since which party will win the election is unknown wages growth is set according to a mean of the Democrat (high) and Republican (low) expected inflation rates. If Democrats are elected they inflate and real wages fall creating a boom. If Republicans are elected they reduce inflation and real wages rise creating a bust. Notice that in PBC theory neither party creates a boom or bust it's uncertainty which drives the result - if the winning party were known there would be neither boom nor bust.
Ok, there's plenty to question about the theory but let's look at the data.
Notice that in the second year of just about every Democratic Presidency there is a boom. Interestingly, the boom is biggest for Truman whose reelection was highly uncertain (remember Dewey wins!) thus expected inflation would have been low and the boom big. Similarly the boom is smallest (relative to the surrounding years) for Clinton II a relatively certain reelection.
Now look at Republicans in just about every second year of a Republican Presidency there is a bust. The one major exception being Reagan II where uncertainty about the outcome was low.
It's pretty clear that this result can explain Bartels's result which is exactly Tyler's point in his post. It's equally clear that when we consider Presidents there aren't many data points. (PBC does appear to hold somewhat in other countries).
Notice that the reason for the result, according to PBC, is sticky wages and the business cycle and not some nefarious story about taxes, oligarchies and political conspiracies.
Haitian prison
If international minimum standards of about four square metres for every prisoner were met, the National Penitentiary would hold a little more than 400 inmates. On the day Maclean's visits the prison, there are 3,331 men jailed inside. Most, at least 90 per cent, have not had a trial. They are held under the euphemistic term "preventative detention," and because of a lack of judges, proper evidence, and even vehicles to transport them to court, it is unlikely many will be tried any time soon. "People sleep on top of people in here," one prisoner says through the bars of a bathroom-sized cell that holds 43 people. Most are standing. Others have fashioned hammocks out of scraps of cloth and have suspended themselves from the bars of the cell's high window, where they can get more light and air...
Here is more. And that is not all:
There is a punishment cell, perhaps four feet tall, where no one can stand. The punishment cell is crowded, but less so than other cells, and some inmates prefer it. "You have people who do things wrong just so they have a place to lie down or to be safe from gangs," Cadet says.
Here is a video about recent food riots in Haiti, and no those are not in the prisons.
Larry Bartels, and how Republican Presidents drive income inequality
He writes:
In any case, the largest partisan differences in income growth, by far, occur in the second year of each administration.
The link, by the way, answers many objections to his basic thesis. View this graph if you don't already know the argument. The core claim is that Republican Presidents are better for the rich and Democratic Presidents are better for the poor, and to a striking degree.
I view the statistical significance of the Bartels result as stemming from monetary policy. Republicans are more willing to break the back of inflation and risk an immediate recession. Alternatively, it could be said that central bankers expect enough support for tough, anti-inflation decisions only from Republican Presidents. (Note that Jimmy Carter, who did support Volcker, is in fact the single Democratic outlier.) Note that without the monetary policy effect, only a few data points, mostly from very recent times, support the basic claim. Without the monetary policy effect, I do not think that statistical significance would remain. Furthermore other plausible channels for income inequality effects, such as tax and regulatory decisions, would not be concentrated in the second year of each administration. Monetary policy decisions would be. A recession, by generating more unemployment, hurts the poor the most in proportional terms.
So what does this all mean?
Inflation is good for the poor in the short run, since many poor are debtors. But inflation is bad for the poor in the long run. Just ask anyone who lived through the New Zealand inflation of the 1970s.
So Bartels could have entitled his key graph: "Democratic Presidents live for the short run and we need a Republican President every now and then."
Addendum: Even Paul Krugman wonders about the basic mechanism driving the result.